In
what way does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and
conventions of real media products?
A typical thriller contains an exciting plot, involving crime or espionage; this is
typified by quick shots and editing and gradual music to build the tension,
these are common in films such as Psycho, this can suddenly change pace at any
time to show action or a point of interest. The main aim of a thriller is to
make the audience feel uncomfortable and shock them by showing them events they
wouldn’t expect to witness. Filmmakers use many different subgenres to
categorise their films, some of the main ones are: psychological, violent,
crime. To a certain extent our production follows the traditional conventions
of a thriller as we featured a ‘damsel in distress’ character being killed, and
our film is a deliberate cliché as we filmed her being tied onto a train track,
with an oncoming train building the tension. We got this idea from early 20th
century films such as “The Perils of Pauline” and “The Gold Rush”, these were
silent films in black and white but they effectively created tension, and this
is what we wanted to replicate in our film. We did originally think about
shooting our film in black and white and having it silent, but we decided that
this was too cliché and could run the risk of almost being comical, so instead
we decided to put an effect on our film which would create the darkness and
tension necessary to make our film effective; this shows evidence of developing
our ideas.
Here’s a brief
list of the typical conventions of a thriller:
A crime at the
core of the narrative (often murder, but not necessarily)
There is usually a crime in the narrative or storyline of a thriller; it keeps the viewer hooked.
There is usually a crime in the narrative or storyline of a thriller; it keeps the viewer hooked.
A complex
narrative structure, with false paths, clues and resolutions
Thrillers are usually made up of these. Mainly to keep the audience questioning, and to make them work out what’s going on, leaving strong enigmas
Thrillers are usually made up of these. Mainly to keep the audience questioning, and to make them work out what’s going on, leaving strong enigmas
A narrative
pattern of establishing enigmas which the viewer expects to be resolved.
This will keep the viewer hooked and he/she will always want to see the resolutions.
This will keep the viewer hooked and he/she will always want to see the resolutions.
Extraordinary
events happening in ordinary situations.
This will enable the audience to relate to the situation, and therefore the effect will be stronger.
This will enable the audience to relate to the situation, and therefore the effect will be stronger.
Themes of
identity.
This is used so the audience can keep tabs on each character, who they are, and why they’re there. It also helps us identify the protagonist and antagonist.
This is used so the audience can keep tabs on each character, who they are, and why they’re there. It also helps us identify the protagonist and antagonist.
Mise en scene
which echoes/mirrors the protagonist’s plight
The mise-en-scene is very important, and needs to be relevant e.g. if the character is happy, put them in a happy place, with bright lights, or if the character is sad, put them in a sad place with dark lighting.
The mise-en-scene is very important, and needs to be relevant e.g. if the character is happy, put them in a happy place, with bright lights, or if the character is sad, put them in a sad place with dark lighting.
Although we
have followed some conventions of thrillers, these conventions were quite
out-dated, so our film could be considered to be retro. We challenged
conventions by filming our short clip in multiple locations; this is not
usually done which emphasises the fact that we wanted to follow the original
conventions of thrillers, but add our own twist to them. We also watched many
modern thrillers such as: No Country for Old Men, Leon, The Terminator, etc. we
did this to give use a modern scope to integrate into our production. We
couldn’t rely on solely basing our ideas from films nearly 100 years old as
they didn’t have all the cameras and equipment necessary to make an effective
modern thriller, so we watched some modern ones to broaden our horizons which
would allow us to develop our ideas further; this allowed us to add modern
camera and editing techniques such as flashbacks to our thriller – these are
ubiquitous in modern films. Our production also follows the conventions of a
thriller with the way we worked our cameras and editing; we used quick shots
between the action and the oncoming train to build tension and to make the
audience feel uncomfortable as they know something bad will inevitably happen,
we also did this to constantly remind the audience of the impending danger.
Our music was
very conventional as it was quiet, background music which didn’t interfere with
the other concepts in our thriller; it’s similar to the music featured in films
such as “Psycho” where it would gradually build tension to make the audience
feel uncomfortable. Where we challenged the sound conventions was we included a
narrative from a poem called ‘Cousin Kate’ we used this as a main base for our
production as we called our production ‘Kate’s revenge’. This shows that we
based all our ideas around a single piece of text; this is very unconventional
as this isn’t usually done; filmmakers usually base their ideas on lots of
different things, we purposely went against this to challenge conventions and
to make our production more unique.
For a thriller to be truly
effective it needs to abide by and challenge conventions in a way which
attracts the audience and keeps them enthralled, some techniques that
filmmakers use to do this include: dual narrative, flashbacks, etc. flashbacks
are notably more prevalent in thrillers with films such as Total Recall and
Pulp fiction featuring them.
One way with which we
followed the conventions was with our props as we had the killer wearing the
typical criminal attire; balaclava, gloves, trainers, etc.
This shot is quite
conventional as it clearly shows the killers assertion of power and dominance
over the weak victim; this is signified by the over the shoulder shot we used
to ensure the audience views it from the killers’ perspective – giving the
audience biased perspectives, which we did to emphasise the killer’s power. We
also used quick editing to speed up the pace of this scene which would
intensify the tension of this scene. The mise-en-scene is also conventional as
everything in this shot is what you would expect to see in a typical thriller
production; as we used the typical characters, followed a basic plot, had the
killer wielding a weapon, and the camera and editing compliments the scene as
it increases the tension and makes the audience feel uncomfortable – this is
essential for an effective thriller production and is popular in titles such as
Sin City.
This shot was taken
from the film Psycho, one of the most illustrious thriller productions of all
time; this shot is similar in following conventions as it effectively shows the
balance of power the director wanted to convey, just like we did with our scene.
The audience cannot see both of the protagonists’ faces, this has been done to
conceal their identities which create a sense of mystery, the lighting and the
way the water is positioned is also used to achieve this. The mise-en-scene is
conventional as it features a traditional prop with a knife, but the camera
angle, the costumes, and the setting is unconventional as they aren’t often
featured in thrillers.







No comments:
Post a Comment